OutlookUservoice_icon_outlook Outlook Feedback by UserVoice

Nick Roberts

My feedback

  1. 4,388 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    340 comments  ·  Outlook 2016 for Windows » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nick Roberts supported this idea  · 
  2. 2,586 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    266 comments  ·  Outlook 2016 for Windows » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nick Roberts supported this idea  · 
    Nick Roberts commented  · 

    If I arrange a meeting or a set of recurring meetings, but then have to drop out - it either has to be left with all of the issues about subsequent updates etc. or has to be cancelled and re-arranged by someone else, with all of the additional effort that that entails. Why isn't there a type of update to the invite where I can re-assign ownership to someone alse?

  3. 105 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Outlook 2016 for Windows » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nick Roberts commented  · 

    If you have a meeting invite and then subsequently decide that you need another meeting or meetings with the same people you have to create the meeting invite from scratch. Why can't you provide a facility to copy (or clone) an existing meeting invite to create others - it would save a lot of time

    Nick Roberts supported this idea  · 
  4. 79 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Outlook 2016 for Windows » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nick Roberts commented  · 

    If people accept an invite without replying I don't see this information in the meeting tracking, but if they do send a response it generates a lot of (largely) unnecessary e-mail traffic, particularly if there are many people at the meeting or it is a series of meetings. Could there be an option to accept the meeting and update the tracking without generating the e-mail traffic, particularly if there are no comments on the response. I then only need to check the e-mails that I receive, which will be the ones with comments on.

    Nick Roberts supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base