OutlookUservoice_icon_outlook Outlook Feedback by UserVoice

Mattt

My feedback

  1. 28 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mattt supported this idea  · 
  2. 67 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    50 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mattt commented  · 

    If you insist on hiding these options (which also serves no benefit) at least correct the label to 'Junk Options' or something that actually makes sense. Putting these options under 'Not Junk' is insanity.

    Mattt supported this idea  · 
  3. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mattt supported this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Mail  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mattt shared this idea  · 
  5. 101 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    45 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mattt supported this idea  · 
  6. 163 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    129 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Chat  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mattt supported this idea  · 
  7. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Mail  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mattt supported this idea  · 
  8. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Mail  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mattt supported this idea  · 
  9. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mattt supported this idea  · 
  10. 673 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    809 comments  ·  Outlook.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mattt commented  · 

    I can't believe how long this issue has gone unresolved for, and the fact that it's actually got WORSE. Microsoft clearly have no interest or understanding in user privacy anymore. The facility to retain this setting used to exist, but it was removed. There was no reason to remove it. "This feature is not currently available" is not an excuse. I urge Microsoft to do something about it before this issue blows up even further.

    Mattt supported this idea  · 
    Mattt commented  · 

    Visibility should remain at the setting it was last set to. Being auto-signed-in as 'available' is an annoying privacy issue, and it's been like this for far too long, despite complaints. Unacceptable.

  11. 334 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    120 comments  ·  Outlook.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mattt supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base