OutlookUservoice_icon_outlook Outlook Feedback by UserVoice

D

My feedback

  1. 1,994 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  484 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    yes occurring more and more.

    elow is an example - mesage source for your review.
    Received: from DM6NAM10HT022.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com

    (2603:1096:100:2d::19) by SLXP216MB0815.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM with HTTPS

    via SL2PR04CA0007.APCPRD04.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 00:01:15 +0000

    ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass;

    b=cdnNSA96tPte22QMswu03ZZTda9QRUEPsVVTTiWcTIHnTSkuTvYdJn1BGC3cSMFWLheHTixJ9PzPAoQDG+KVUQmM7qTnFxiTXrfmk/b71nTyI6a6Ru3ogB7vzkRB80/iEhatEtGccGzqbkReThV3aL1YuXKXK2Ts28JdY5Xwy+S+JxO6/pjboLJ1O7LlQOBhXQTJUJzu0cXVKR4G5qsxJtfU3b/axEo4IUktbRDT4DcCS2aqbQHPkjSTNHECZpD1L0S7ruxt5tG/qDLc9nkoi1WN0ustHSrFE0oOY71mISDkXr4m6AfXBASILrZomc0jya8Q34BfXvxsT5rx3gCChQ==

    ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;

    s=arcselector9901;

    h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;

    bh=uxjNsN4xLZ735kUhpJAFiW1prJldcTIyAVdR4Xv++Es=;

    b=nVlV/qv5OLfgm0JAPA1Xq2NAYljwhWRl2UR1b/vfEEsiYVggGUzc/n94qMO7bH9BuHRHugUhBnhwGHnabKJ46ZoAMPhVLM+9whhQ5PokXXpkvXlM3IbVf6HV9U4ohTarZ2ReTF310e2c/54M7HOrJguJDQerH2Z2wSsLWV+z0bURViHxD7yqpjUEXSfpTd3R7gwl86w8QbFT69WvXGjWkwd881kmEx0OVHWWMz6jXV+7o5dM7aZvESlxoUeSYOYx2ha4icZZx5QpT7KZfkEmZopivr74nrRCenKp+H9j9z9KtRPKwNAEJRfLpkx2PELZpgbR/fNc2CNJtxpNnxzYqQ==

    ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is

    40.107.79.128) smtp.rcpttodomain=hotmail.com

    smtp.mailfrom=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none

    header.from=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified)

    header.d=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1

    spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com]

    dkim=[1,1,header.d=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com]

    dmarc=[1,1,header.from=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com])

    Received: from DM6NAM10FT004.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com

    (2a01:111:e400:7e86::53) by

    DM6NAM10HT022.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e86::72)

    with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,

    cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2878.15; Tue, 7 Apr

    2020 00:01:14 +0000

    Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.107.79.128)

    smtp.mailfrom=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com; hotmail.com; dkim=pass (signature

    was verified) header.d=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com;hotmail.com;

    dmarc=bestguesspass action=none

    header.from=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com;compauth=pass reason=109

    Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of

    fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com designates 40.107.79.128 as permitted sender)

    receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.107.79.128;

    helo=NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com;

    Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.107.79.128)

    by DM6NAM10FT004.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.152.222) with Microsoft

    SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id

    15.20.2878.15 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 00:01:14 +0000

    X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker:

    OriginalChecksum:A8560D82EA7A3827E2BFF1F1DCF581465884FBFD0FD120B8BEE8CEFE911C0ED9;UpperCasedChecksum:3336346B98C9C04F06644F08666FC85549479D8BA69598E91BE96991D1C5DE61;SizeAsReceived:5763;Count:42

    ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none;

    b=ISmnwgQ7F56uzBJ/oiQtEtgl9Fgj3C9NH+5ciy44pRyx3+bwLP4H46zp+WMbMXebeePkxc53H+wblDYuDGNrRl5Wl10y0RaQU61FVqrWXCcsu/KxDYBcPyjuCKwIS/2wdZ0De1+yZ0v7rkqHLYQQLkAqR5mJXdSA/4nCjaeSXz7Ea2MxUqBKnQkm4o5f+0V307MFJYwg4T1COhd8DdRNlUvvXMY78CMA2lDbXecP0HdEGl7JRAahtkUQ+n1Qs1oK9q+NgTe8blqpNgNSE4Gq9jTpXKZiHNTemQmKP8SpZioaq/PYguZjciw78OHY9NWqIrQQuDyLG+HVabi3/EtDBA==

    ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;

    s=arcselector9901;

    h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;

    bh=uxjNsN4xLZ735kUhpJAFiW1prJldcTIyAVdR4Xv++Es=;

    b=nJCs+KPOHO9nI6lmHMSqmct7YKVXWOiHB9Dluc3bBftwPbgas91v5qgEg1f1liZbO+NOFq/gZB+1DUGQv2funjnb6neoTZM59hS5+i+X7iki6PdEmpgJFvARhA1PgkCLPsSfII94hP7OOoxtuKk9PoESKDV6xolQ04ebGKveMxCB4xmifr8XALWKYbdJ7ht2o7/+CChRa7bJvAagCisKuC3rI4fWaPyxqjN2igKoLAnK1/cqec/ml/L/6QfmAMkoGx5lSS9Zydwoi3TQJG7UC+3hJU5tQxQUqqXQZGs9JggECM2mbSL9h51Al6QFYpzPNM4W60k+3keJDRQJJfRTQQ==

    ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass

    smtp.mailfrom=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com; dmarc=pass action=none

    header.from=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com; dkim=pass

    header.d=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com; arc=none

    DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;

    d=fiscallnf.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-fiscallnf-onmicrosoft-com;

    D supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,601 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  251 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    D supported this idea  · 
  3. 211 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    49 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Focused Inbox and now Search Top results. This has not improved with the new outlook. Theme seems to be destroying perfectly functioning features rather the any improvement..yes do not forget Junk / Spam filtering failure.
    Searching inbox and all folders does not mean need ot require the complete web to match key words

  4. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    43 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Am missing folder, subfolder and emails filed away as a result.
    How does one retrieve and why no such information, assistance available??

    Result of this, now broken the trust in the MS environment

    Are you holding my data to RANSOM??

    D supported this idea  · 
  5. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Mail  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Am missing folders and email that are reqired and referenced.
    How does one go about retrieving???

    Is this some form of RANSOM for not moving or taking up paid 365 services whereby limitation placed to number of folders???

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Hello,
    Am missing folders from outlook. How do we retrieve this and why not manner to retrieve?
    Are we being held RANSOM to our data for not moving over to paid Outlook 365???

  6. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    26 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    D supported this idea  · 
  7. 72 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Totally agree with starting assessment

    Within Setting under Junk Email
    Have title as "Blocked Senders and Domains"
    Then have subtitle as "Move email from these senders or domains to junk email folder"

    This just does not make sense at all.
    Would like the email blocked PERIOD. NOT moved to my junk email folder. This is an oversight of the nth degree.
    You have legit emails one's sent out by Microsoft or uservoice that end up within the junk folder. definite the algorithm or defined logic not functioning properly

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Microsoft,
    The block feature does not function. Meaning does not block email. Have added in fluxecho.com and smtp.fluxecho.com (along with all variant source IP addresses) yet MS has it listed as permitted . See below email source information as example.
    1.Adding domains, email addresses, IP addresses to the Blocked section within Junk email that it will BLOCK such emails and content. This IS NOT the case.
    I for one do not want those emails moved to Junk email section, want them to be blocked. As the heading states BLOCKED senders and domains.
    2. Source Email destinations and listed reply/displayed emails differ (again refer below example). Since spammers and bots generate over 50% of email traffic, High Improvement would be blocking all elements being email source ip and domain info, displayed email address and return path email addresses.
    3. Within junk Email - BLOCKED senders and domains: Line statement reads 'Move email from these senders or Domains to my Junk Email folder". From this you re NOT clocking emails just moving them to my junk Email Folder. This is so misleading
    As defined by Collins dictionary: If something is blocked or blocked up, it is completely closed so that nothing can get through it.
    Imagine NFL team using the Microsoft blocking technique.........
    Thank you for your time and wish you safe holidays.
    Example Below
    Received: from BN8NAM11HT034.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com

    (2603:1096:100:55::13) by SL2P216MB0859.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM with HTTPS

    via SL2PR03CA0001.APCPRD03.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:33:26 +0000

    Received: from BN8NAM11FT005.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com

    (10.13.176.59) by BN8NAM11HT034.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com

    (10.13.177.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,

    cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2581.11; Thu, 26 Dec

    2019 18:33:24 +0000

    Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 92.39.192.57)

    smtp.mailfrom=fluxecho.com; hotmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed)

    header.d=none;hotmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=spendnest.com;

    Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of fluxecho.com designates

    92.39.192.57 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;

    client-ip=92.39.192.57; helo=vUPJA7z7QQ.toymaker.3tM6c5s;

    Received: from vUPJA7z7QQ.toymaker.3tM6c5s (92.39.192.57) by

    BN8NAM11FT005.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.176.69) with Microsoft SMTP

    Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id

    15.20.2581.11 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:33:22 +0000

    X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker:

    OriginalChecksum:3AB75D7E744AB9B8E921F40F478676FE833A955962BD539A3A4CA2468BB8FCFC;UpperCasedChecksum:1B9A5C13AB1AAC48EAE061B345CCB17E409415EE029B00AEBC4F8D2B088BF316;SizeAsReceived:321;Count:7

    Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 03:23:31 +0900

    From: "HomeProtectQuote.com" <Idhmd48wa87U.oR@spendnest.com>

  8. 72 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  31 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    D supported this idea  · 
  9. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Recent improvements to Search functionality have counter measured the feature.
    Find using the search function totally unproductive
    - far too many results appear even when specific words utilised
    - top results section ineffective
    - all includes the deleted items, showing deleted spam
    - unable to move email from search results

    Over complicated feature that working fine previously

  10. 3,311 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  1518 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    This now appears to be a VERY COMMON theme.
    Have blocked and blocked but now receive approx 40 plus junk emails daily.

    Reviewing and attempting to stop from email source is fruitless.
    Domain fluecho.com continues to wreak havoc using multiple addresses. Seem block one generates another tow.
    Irregardless of which level of outlook one utlises security policy blocking of spam, phishing schemes should be at the forefront
    The below is just one example of many.
    Source details below - comes in with email name as RenewalByAnderson

    Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 118.42.100.254)

    smtp.mailfrom=fluxecho.com; hotmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed)

    header.d=none;hotmail.com; dmarc=none action=none

    header.from=web-dynamic-link.eu;

    Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of fluxecho.com designates

    118.42.100.254 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;

    client-ip=118.42.100.254; helo=2.fuddled.QW9E5ZnY4V5;

    Received: from 2.fuddled.QW9E5ZnY4V5 (118.42.100.254) by

    DB3EUR04FT010.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.24.146) with Microsoft SMTP

    Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id

    15.20.2644.19 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:26:52 +0000

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    totally agree.
    Have email like this 'From: PlatinumCardFromCreditOne! <support@vPqHErQ7oe.humansavelifefromfire.com>' able to come thru into inbox, yet required emails or informational emails from legit organisations end up as spam.
    Of all the recent changes, the smtp information provided in the POP section, been beneficial. This should be your standard to follow.
    All other changes sadly been underwhelming, invaluable especially this junk filtering.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    way too many junk emails. Along withthe block button not functioning after being restored.
    Way more interested in the cosmetic appearance and adding in non essential linkedin contact link than being attentive to the junk email situation. Tuely messed with and broke feature that worked well many moons ago.

  11. 3,694 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  1797 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Mail  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    D supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Following on from previous comment
    Here is another example for you

    Emails display information and source email details differ and use @adidas.com and microsoft domains..

    Received: from SG2APC01HT068.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com

    (2603:1096:100:19::33) by SL2P216MB0859.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM with HTTPS

    via SL2P216CA0071.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 02:33:53 +0000

    Received: from SG2APC01FT030.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com

    (10.152.250.54) by SG2APC01HT068.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com

    (10.152.251.166) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,

    cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2581.11; Fri, 27 Dec

    2019 02:33:53 +0000

    Authentication-Results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 18.195.119.146)

    smtp.mailfrom=adidas.com; hotmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed)

    header.d=none;hotmail.com; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=adidas.com;

    Received-SPF: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning

    adidas.com discourages use of 18.195.119.146 as permitted sender)

    Received: from gezblshzen.microsoft.com (18.195.119.146) by

    SG2APC01FT030.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.200) with Microsoft

    SMTP Server id 15.20.2581.11 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 27 Dec 2019

    02:33:50 +0000

    X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker:

    OriginalChecksum:EC8EADF1A82DB9D9A3A8B5737AC8905A99CB08841CFDD900110DFFDA8B2B369C;UpperCasedChecksum:D14024F134AE8B12C63CB71C9C669346DA299341DD49547D62BE701FB48C1749;SizeAsReceived:561;Count:10

    From: Lose weight now 💯 💯 <i8ETmrj0_6Gx1l@adidas.com>

    Subject: New Secret to Shed Weight 🤫 🤫

    Reply-To: weXi1rV8_XJOPi@adidas.com

    Received: from trial-privacy.space (172.31.36.213) by trial-privacy.space id KxbI3ahhj9Zw for xent

  12. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Yes need to disable
    not only is it displaying incorrectly showing incorrect search result and only adding to the confusion,
    it is listing all the spam email addresses with linkedin information.

    D supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base