OutlookUservoice_icon_outlook Outlook Feedback by UserVoice

SAinCA_55

My feedback

  1. 3,570 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  1754 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Mail  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    Yep. Ditto. Incompetence exhibited by Microsoft QA, perhaps...? Or maybe we complain too much and we are getting a single-digit gesticulation? This whole junk thing is getting so old...

    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  2. 309 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    358 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  3. 221 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  4. 746 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  167 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  5. 184 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    69 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Mail  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  6. 864 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  127 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,908 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  466 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  8. 867 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    307 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  9. 3,229 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  1460 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    Seriously Microsoft - ECH3DjvsECH3Djvs.com is a VALID DOMAIN, my ELBOW! Ditch these at the front door, will you... STOP FLOODING OUR SPAM FOLDERS WITH GARBAGE! SEVENTY-PLUS in 36 hours - COME ON. Pay someone to DO a job, not just play at it!

  10. 208 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    32 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    TLD-blocking has LONG been requested. It's no good MS intercepting as SPAM, dumping the garbage in our SPAM folder, when the TLD (i.e., .club), is being used as a public spam-toilet, and WE cannot put a "DELETE THIS dot-club GARBAGE" Rule in place..... Yet again REQUESTING (nice wording) "APPLY RULES TO SPAM NOT JUST INBOX!"

    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  11. 150 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    275 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    You even put out a header above the email, in the Junk Folder view pane: "This is from a TRUSTED SENDER", so do YOU have "trust issues"?

    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  12. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  13. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  14. 44 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  15. 52 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
  16. 990 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    152 comments  ·  Outlook.com » Mail  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SAinCA_55 supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    "Walk-in Bathtub Shop" - no email in FROM, and yet it gets through... WHY? It is clearly BOGUS. Kill on sight, chaps.

  17. 100 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    45 comments  ·  The new Outlook.com » Spam  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    cbd@ as "in email header = It still gets to Junk Folder, even though I state, mark as junk, delete, cease processing rules. BUG!!

  18. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Outlook.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    HOW does an email (SPAM) that has NO VISIBLE "FROM" Address get through the front door? You need to BOUNCE every last one of those... 50x them! Please. Look for the "From name" being "Mens Health Center" - trace I.P. and DDOS them...

    Thanks!

  19. 1,203 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1522 comments  ·  Outlook.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    These spammers using, support.10+stephen_anslow=msn.com@ in heir message header are beating you hands down...

    I have THREE "sweep" rules set up but I guess you do your own thing before MY Rules get a look in... So I get 50 or more PER DAY of this type and I cannot stop them...

    Can you PLEASE process MY SWEEP RULES even if you think an item is SPAM...? By all means mark it as a SPAM-candidate, but then pass it through my rules so I can DELETE THE THINGS! I cannot block the high-level domain - it would take me HOURS every week to do that because the scumbags generate fake domains all the time.

    PLEASE, PLEASE, BLOCK-N-KILL these nuisances...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    mogabolagfma.com are still getting through the hole-riddled SPAM filter.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    mogabolagfma.com - blocked at domain level. Still getting SPAM in Inbox.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    anahowzzahadak.com is in my blocked senders at the DOMAIN Level. SPAM still gets through to my inbox...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    emailservices@dealnews.com whether blocked as an address or dealnews.com is getting past you SPA filters, yet again...

    These people need to be nuked off the face of the earth, so to speak!

    And I'm not getting FIFTY **** SPAM EMAILS A DAY! And I have "CONTACTS ONLY" so there is no seeming way these pustules should be getting their garbage through...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    The spammers have found another way around your SPAM Filter.

    If you get the format like this, please add a DDOS ATTACK RESPONSE to the originating I.P.! support.5437896201+stephen_anslow=msn.com@Vargas.anahowzzahadak.com

    They are ABUSING the msn.com domain - that should inspire you...

  20. 1,452 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    727 comments  ·  Outlook.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SAinCA_55 commented  · 

    Please, please, give us a way to UNIVERSALLY block a TOP LEVEL domain.

    .pw (definitely NOT "Professional Web" unless SPAMMING can be regarded as a "profession") is the most ABUSED TLD out there. Cut the b******s off, please!

    And let us add a DOMAIN to the Blocked Sender list form the Junk Mail mouse-over of the sent-from address. It is ridiculous to have to copy the domain, go to settings, navigate to the blocked senders list, then add ONE, Save, and return, only to find another domain to block the h**l out of!

    And since when did the "Enter" key in response to the "Blocked <email address>" STOP WORKING? It's ridiculous to have to mouse to OK then back to the next piece of junk to block it, too. Yes, we could examine every junk mail, "Not junk" the real ones, then select all and one-time Block, but "Block+Enter" was so FAST... Please put it back! And please make OK on any dialog in the Junk Mail folder active - it was inconsistent...

    Thanks!

← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base